Legal Opinion

Newman v. Minyard Food Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1980No. 20281PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOREY, Justice.

Plaintiff, a witness to his wife’s slip and fall accident, sued to recover damages for his own mental anguish and for loss of consortium resulting from his wife’s injuries. Summary judgment was granted defendant on each element of damage. The trial court ruled as a matter of law that there could be no recovery for mental anguish in the absence of some definable physical injury; and that except for an intentional invasion no cause of action for loss of consortium existed in Texas at the time of the occurrence in question. We disagree with the trial court’s ruling on each ground…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Whittlesey v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hill v. KimballTexas Supreme Court · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Haught v. MaceluchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Dawson v. Garcia, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1984
  3. Jose BARRERA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Witty v. American General Capital Distributors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  5. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Dawson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API