Legal Opinion

Hill v. Kimball

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1890No. 2644PublishedCited by 161 opinions

Appeal from Freestone.. Tried below before Hon. Sam. R. Frost.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Associate Justice.

The case presented by the petition in

this suit being novel, we were in doubt whether the facts alleged showed a cause of action, and for that reason set aside the submission at the last term and requested counsel to submit arguments upon that question. The question has been argued and the cause again submitted for determination. The defendant below, the appellee here, interposed an exception to the petition on the ground that he was not sued in the county of his residence, and the exception was sustained by the ness of that ruling depends upon the nature of the uv!.

*215Th…

2Cited by161 opinions

  1. El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Boyles v. KerrTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. City of Tyler v. LikesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API