Legal Opinion
People v. Minter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 7, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the showup conducted by police was impermissibly suggestive. The showup occurred within 20 to 25 minutes of the robbery following defendant’s apprehension within 150 to 200 yards of the crime scene. Where, as here, the showup is made in proximity to the time and place where the crime occurred, it is an acceptable means of securing a suspect’s identification (see, People v Brnja, 50 NY2d 366, 372; People v Jordan, 178 AD2d 1009, 1010, lv denied 79 NY2d 920; People v Everett, 147 AD2d 896, 897). In such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BrnjaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. JordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. PlantzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. HendrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Boles v. SenkowskiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1995
- People v. RupertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. CollinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995