Legal Opinion
People v. Plantz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 11, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The showup was permissible because the suspect was apprehended shortly after the report of the crime and was immediately viewed by the victim (see, People v Love, 57 NY2d 1023, 1024; People v Everett, 147 AD2d 896). The fact that defendant was in police custody when the showup was conducted does not invalidate the showup (see, People v Brnja, 50 NY2d 366). The victim’s identification at the showup was reliable because it was based on the suspect’s distinctive clothing and physical characteristics (see, People v Johnson, 137 AD2d 719; People v Meeks,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BrnjaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. DennisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. MeeksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cohen v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- People v. JordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. MinterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Piesco v. City of New York, Dept. of PersonnelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990