People v. Rupert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in failing to conduct an inquiry to determine whether he was aware of his right to testify and chose to *1073waive that right. Because there is no evidence in the record that the trial court or defendant’s attorney deprived defendant of his right to testify (see, People v Doe, 186 AD2d 1036), the trial court was not required to inquire into defendant’s failure to testify (see, People v Russell, 192 AD2d 1102 [decided herewith]).
We also find no merit to defendant’s contention that his showup identification by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BrnjaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. MoralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. GeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. SnowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. OcasioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. ReedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. CollinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995