People v. Love
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
To the extent that defendant seeks to argue that the showup was not necessary because Officer Phillips had himself identified defendant, the point has not been preserved for our review. Moreover, though the better practice when feasible is not to conduct a showup before a group of witnesses (People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241, 249), procedures that are less than ideal may, as Adams held, be tolerable in the interest of prompt identification. This is particularly so in a case such as the present, in view of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. TrowbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BrnjaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by276 opinions
- People v. HicksNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. DuuvonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. WhartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. FlemingNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.