Legal Opinion
Freeland v. AT & T Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 17, 2006No. 04 CIV. 8653(DLC)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
COTE, District Judge.
The plaintiffs move for class certification in this antitrust action pursuant to Rules 23(b)(2) and (b)(3), Fed.R.Civ.P. That motion is denied.
Background
The plaintiffs are purchasers of cellular telephones and wireless telephone service from the defendants, the four largest providers of wireless telephone services in the United States.1 They allege that the defendants have violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 & 2, by conspiring to restrain trade, conspiring to monopolize, tying, and making contracts in restraint of trade.
A.…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jackson v. Bloomberg, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Spagnola v. Chubb Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In re Digital Music Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- In re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- In re NYSE Specialists Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.