Legal Opinion
In re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 18, 2008No. C 06-07417 WHA. MDL No. 1826PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*479ORDER CERTIFYING LIMITED DIRECT-PURCHASER CLASS AND DENYING INDIRECT PURCHASER
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this antitrust multi-district litigation, direct-purchaser plaintiffs and indirect-purchaser plaintiffs separately move for class certification. Rather than the massive classes proposed, a more limited direct-purchaser class will be certified. Indirect-purchasers’ motion for class certification is Denied.
*480STATEMENT
Defendants Nvidia Corp. and ATI Technologies, Inc., make graphics processing units, or GPUs. Defendant Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., acquired ATI in September…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- In re Digital Music Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Wiener v. Dannon Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2009
- In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- In re Automotive Parts Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.