Legal Opinion
Jones v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided February 10, 1971No. [No. 237, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.
This is an appeal ¡from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Sodaro, j.) which did not agree with John Richard Jones that he should have been allowed to bring an action against the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board. Jones still contends that the unusual manner in which he was injured was a “hit and run” accident; as it is defined in the general provisions of Art. 66 1/2§ 7-620 of the Code (1957, 1970 Repl. VoL), and that he has made “all reasonable efforts,” as required by § 7-620 (5), to identify the car and driver that placed him in the hospital for 188 days with a fracture of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Casanova v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Grady v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Hickman v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- In Re the Arbitration Between Riemenschneider & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- In re the Arbitration between Riemenschneider & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Clark v. Regent Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Brown v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Nicholson v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Norman v. Selective Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Johnson v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.