Johnson v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board

As is the case in most instances where remedial legislation has been, enacted, Maryland’s Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Law, Code (1957, 1970 Repl. Vol.) Art. 66(4, subtitle 7, part VI (the Act) has given rise to a spate of litigation dealing with the question whether the requirements of § 7-620 of the Act, “ ‘Hit-and-run’ cases generally” have been met, Weber v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board, 261 Md. 457, 276 A. 2d 86 (1971) ; Jones v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board, 261 Md. 62, 273 A. 2d 418 (1971) ; Grady v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund Board, 259 Md. 501, 270…