Legal Opinion

Casanova v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1962PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNathaniel T. Helman, J.

Petitioner has applied for an order pursuant to section 618 of the Insurance Law authorizing the commencement of an action against the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by petitioner in a “ hit and run ” accident. Compliance with the requirements of section 608 (subd. [b], cl. [2]) of the Insurance Law is claimed on the basis of affidavits of petitioner and his attorneys that the accident was reported to the police within 24 hours of the occurrence. The name and shield number of one of the patrolmen on the scene is submitted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Horwitt v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gonzalez v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Walsh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  2. Jones v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Gunter v. Constitution State Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Dixon v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. In re the Arbitration between Country Wide Insurance & RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API