Legal Opinion
In Re the Arbitration Between Riemenschneider & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 29, 1967PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*549Bergan, J.
Petitioner’s ward, Oscar Riemenschneidcr, was riding as a passenger in an insured motor vehicle owned by Randolph Valadares, which, while stopped at a toll station, was struck in the rear by another vehicle.
Valadares’ insurance policy contained the standard Mew York Automobile Accident Indemnification Endorsement which, under prescribed circumstances, provides coverage by the respondent-appellant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation.
Immediately after his car was struck, Valadares got out and inspected his own and the other car. Seeing no damage to either, he inquired…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Jones v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- High v. Southwestern Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- In re the Arbitration between Country Wide Insurance & RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Pilgrim Insurance v. MolardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Commerce Insurance Co. v. MendoncaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.