In re the Arbitration between Riemenschneider & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBotein, P. J.
Respondent was one of two passengers in an automobile owned and operated by one Valladares, when the car was struck in the rear by another automobile. Asserting that the latter vehicle was a “ hit-and-run automobile ” within the meaning of the New York automobile accident indemnification endorsement on Valladares’ insurance policy, respondent filed a notice of claim with appellant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) and thereafter demanded arbitration. MVAIC questioned that a hit-and-run automobile was involved in the accident and sought a stay of arbitration. After a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Casanova v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walsh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
- Jones v. Unsatisfied Claim & Judgment Fund BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- In re the Arbitration between Country Wide Insurance & RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Schauer v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.