Legal Opinion

Jerdal v. Sinclair

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1959No. 34825PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

This is an action for personal injuries to a pedestrian who was struck by an automobile about five o’clock p. m., on January 4, 1957. The defendant driver, R. T. Sinclair, is the minor son of defendants Robert B. Sinclair and Helen E. Sinclair, who are joined as defendants under the family-car doctrine. It was dark and cloudy, but the pavement was dry, when the son, alone in the car, entered North 26th street from a service station one block west of the scene of the accident. He turned left and proceeded east to Mason avenue on the south side of North 26th street at a speed of fifteen to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hart v. HoganWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Carlson v. P. F. Collier & Son Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Dillon v. BurnettWashington Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Herman v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hulse v. DriverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Campbell v. PaschalCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Kubista v. RomaineWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Jung v. YorkWashington Supreme Court · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API