Legal Opinion

Kubista v. Romaine

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1976No. 43926PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.

Plaintiff Raymond Kubista, after a jury trial, received verdict and judgment for $25,000 against defendant Paul Romaine for the former’s serious back injuries caused by the latter’s negligence. Plaintiff contends this award is inadequate and appeals.

The principal assigned error is the trial court’s rejection of plaintiff’s offer to prove statements made to plaintiff by an adjuster for defendant’s insurance carrier in charge of the litigation against defendant policyholder. The Court of Appeals, Division Two, in Kubista v. Romaine, 14 Wn. App. 58, 538 P.2d 812 (1975), held the trial court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Burr v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Stoelting v. HauckSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Redman v. Department of EducationAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Schurk v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Bartholomaus v. HG Hill Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lords v. Northern Automotive Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  2. Ainsworth v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Sutton v. ShufelbergerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. FitzgeraldNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Goodwin v. BaconWashington Supreme Court · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API