Legal Opinion

Jung v. York

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1969No. 39466PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

In this action for damages for injuries to a pedestrian, the trial court ruled that the accident was caused solely by the negligence of the defendant and refused to submit to the jury the question of possible contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff. Error is assigned to this ruling.

The evidence shows that the plaintiff, with two small children, one holding the plaintiff’s hand and the other walking in front of her, entered a marked crosswalk on California Avenue S.W. where that arterial intersects with S.W. Edmunds in the city of Seattle; that at least one automobile in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beck v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Rettig v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Hamblet v. SoderburgWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Jerdal v. SinclairWashington Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pudmaroff v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Pudmaroff v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Alston v. BlytheCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. Frankfort v. OwensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Alston v. BlytheCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API