Walter H. Rodin v. Thomas R. Spalding
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
This appeal, prosecuted pro se by the junior party Rodin, is taken from an adverse decision of the Board of Patent Interferences rendered May 17. 1960. The appellant, in a communication attached to his Notice of Appeal dated July 11, 1960, has stated what he asserts to be the “errors” in the appealed decision. These “errors” are further elaborated upon in his brief under the caption “Errors Relied Upon.” These “errors” relate to various matters which cannot be determined on the present record.
While it is rather difficult to understand the basis for all of the “errors” recited by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mason v. HepburnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1898
- Field v. Knowles. Field v. KnowlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. Obear-Nester Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De RooCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Lavin v. PierottiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reese v. HurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Bennett v. SerotaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973