Legal Opinion
Hartford-Empire Co. v. Obear-Nester Glass Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 1, 1934No. 9286PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Circuit Judge.
This is an action for infringement of certain claims of four patents having to do with the feeding of molten glass to molds in which hollow ware, such as bottles and jars, is blown. The patents and claims involved are as follows: Claims 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Peiler, No. 1,405,936, issued February 7, 3922; claims 2, 4, 14, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 31, 33, and 36 of Peiler, No. 1,662,436, issued March 13, 1928; claims 24, 26, and 31 of Peiler, No. I, 662,437, issued March 13, 1928; and claim 22 of Ferngren, No. 1,677,436, issued July 17, 1928. From dismissal of its hill on the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Fox Film Corp. v. DoyalSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Field v. Knowles. Field v. KnowlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Hartford-Empire Co. v. OBEARNESTER GLASS CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Steiner Sales Co. v. Schwartz Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Darsyn Laboratories, Inc. v. Lenox Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
- Cleveland Punch & Shear Works Co. v. E. W. Bliss Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.