Legal Opinion

Lavin v. Pierotti

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 6, 1942No. Patent Appeals 4633PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of *884Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention of the subject matter defined in the single count in issue to appellee.

The invention relates to a refrigerating or cooling system for automobiles, and is sufficiently defined in the involved count which reads:

“1. The combination with an automobile powered by an internal combustion engine, of a conduit connected to the intake manifold of said engine and a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hemphill Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. In re BeckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  3. Williams Oil-O-Matic Heating Corporation v. Butler Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. Doherty v. DubbsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  5. Lee v. VreelandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Field v. Knowles. Field v. KnowlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  2. Application of George H. Hitchings, Gertrude B. Elion and Irving GoodmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. Application of Josef FriedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. Philip A. Hunt Co. v. Mallinckrodt Chemical WorksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  5. Toledo Scale Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Toledo Scale CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API