Legal Opinion

People v. Bergner

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 2, 1994No. 94SA71PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent 1 in this attorney disciplinary proceeding, L. Frank Bergner, Jr., was charged with engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on his fitness to practice law. The assistant disciplinary counsel and the respondent subsequently entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.-18(a). In the stipulation, the parties recommended discipline in the range of a public censure to a private censure. An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the stipulation, with the recommendation that the respondent receive a public…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. People v. ZeilingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against GibsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. CrossmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. GoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. In Re a Member of the State BarArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re AshySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  4. In Re YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. People v. MeierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API