Legal Opinion

People v. Meier

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 9, 1998No. 97SA157PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent in this lawyer discipline ease was admitted to practice law in Colora do in 1993. A hearing panel of the supreme court grievance committee accepted the findings of a hearing board that the respondent had made inappropriate comments and asked improper questions of a prospective dissolution of marriage client. The hearing panel modified the board’s recommendation of a private censure to a public censure, given the vulnerability of the victim and unimpressive nature of the factors in mitigation. We accept the hearing panel’s recommendation and publicly censure the respondent.

I

Follo…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. William DidomenicoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. People v. MorleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. United States v. Mark TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. Burlington Northern Railroad v. HoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  5. State v. BernierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Discipline of LernerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. SmallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. People v. CrespiColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Meier v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  5. People v. CarterColorado Court of Appeals · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API