Legal Opinion

In Re Yarborough

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 7, 1999No. 24951PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary proceeding, respondent, Ernest E. Yarborough, is charged with committing misconduct arising out of his alleged improper conduct toward a client. We find respondent committed misconduct and impose a public reprimand. 1

FACTS

Client testified on or about June 24, 1996, respondent was retained to represent her as Personal Representative of her brother’s estate in a legal malpractice action against Attorney I, who had been retained to handle a wrongful death action on her behalf. At that time, client was an unmarried, 24 year old college student. Respondent provided…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SopherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. In Re RinellaIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. Matter of MarshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  5. In Re a Member of the State BarArizona Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Gerald Anthony Lyman MoothartSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. In Re LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. In re Van SonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. In Re DevineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. In Re PurvisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API