Legal Opinion
Ark-La Feed & Fertilizer Company v. Marco Chemical Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 26, 1961No. 16614_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, District Judge.
This appeal, in a diversity suit, is from a final judgment quashing service of the summons and the complaint on the ground that the activities of the defendant corporation within Arkansas were not such as to permit service of process on the Secretary of State under Arkansas law.1
The factual situation, relied on by both parties, except as shown in the footnote, and submitted as being material on all of the issues raised by the motion are agreed on and settled by stipulation and may be summarized as follows:
That Marco Chemical Company, the appellee, defendant below,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Curtis Publishing Company, a Corporation v. Louis CasselCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Bertha Jennings v. McCall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Gkiafis v. Steamship YiosonasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
- Podolsky v. DevinneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.