Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burton
This case calls for an answer to the question whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States precludes Ohio from subjecting a foreign corporation to the jurisdiction of its courts in this action in personam. The corporation has been carrying on in Ohio a continuous and systematic, but limited, part of its general business. Its president, while engaged in doing such business in Ohio, has been served with summons in this proceeding. The cause of action sued upon did not arise in Ohio and does not relate to the corporation’s activities there.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- St. Clair v. CoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,478 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
1,473 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.