Legal Opinion

Podolsky v. Devinney

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 26, 1968No. 67 Civ. 3150PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROAKE, District Judge.

OPINION

The present motion, seeking vacation of an order of attachment, challenges the constitutionality of the recent decision by the New York Court of Appeals in Seider v. Roth, 17 N.Y.2d 111, 269 N.Y.S.2d 99, 216 N.E.2d 312 (1966). 1 In that case the Court of Appeals decided that an automobile liability insurance policy held with an insurance company doing business in New York becomes an attachable debt within the meaning of §§ 5201 and 6202 N.Y.C.P.L.R. 2 upon the occurrence of an automobile accident. 3 The defendants, through attorneys secured by their insurer,…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Maury A. Ryan, D/B/A Ryan, Klimek, Ryan Partnership v. Royal Insurance Company of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Minichiello v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  3. Libra Bank Ltd. v. Banco Nacional De Costa Rica, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
  4. Rintala v. ShoemakerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973
  5. Parker v. Agricultural InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API