Legal Opinion
Schoonover v. Reed
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1879PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Erom the Warren Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Suit for malicious prosecution. The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first reads as follows :
“W. H. H. Reed complains of James Schoonover, and says that said defendant, maliciously and without probable cause, instituted a criminal prosecution against the plaintiff herein, jointly with others, charging them with having, on or about the 10th day of September, 1873, committed a malicious trespass, by then and there tearing down a house, the property of said Schoonover, and hauling it away, maliciously and mischievously, at said county; that said charge was preferred, and prosecution…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stancliff v. PalmeterIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- McCullough v. RiceIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Ruston v. BiddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Carey v. SheetsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by3 opinions
- Helwig v. BecknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Indiana Bicycle Co. v. WillisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Swindell v. HouckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891