Legal Opinion

Ruston v. Biddle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Tipton Circuit Court;

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.

This was an action for malicious prosecution, brought by the appellee against the appellant, in which there was judgment for the plaintiff. There are three errors properly assigned in this court. 1st. The overruling of a demurrer which was filed by the defendant to the complaint. 2d. Overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial. 3d. Overruling his motion in arrest of judgment.

The first and third assignments of error present the same question, that is, the sufficiency of the complaint. The complaint alleges that heretofore, to wit, on, etc., at, etc., the defendant falsely, maliciously,…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. GravesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Coffey v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Smith v. ZentIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Schoonover v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Swindell v. HouckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API