Legal Opinion

Leboire v. Royce

California Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1960No. S. F. 19848PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

These three consolidated actions involve a controversy between joint venturers, Hyman-Michaels Company on the one side and Ken F. Boyce and Ken Boyce, Inc., on the other, over commissions paid by Boyce to one Leon Leboire, and over attorney’s fees paid by Boyce in defending certain actions brought by Leboire against him. The basic contention of Boyce is that these expenses were covered by the joint venture agreements executed by the parties.

The background facts are as follows: In 1947 Boyce became interested in the purchase of war surplus construction machinery in the Pacific Ocean area. In…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Collins v. Vickter Manor, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Hawkins v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  4. Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Schmidt v. MacCo Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wong v. Di GraziaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ferrell Construction Co. v. Russell Creek Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. Kadner v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. San Bernardino Valley Water Development Co. v. San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Patrick J. Ruane, Inc. v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API