Legal Opinion

Curtis v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1925No. 18991PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

This cause originated in the court of common pleas of Stark county, by the indictment of Edward E. Curtis „on a charge of accepting a bribe, while acting as director of public safety of the city of Canton. It is charged that on March 2, 1923, he accepted from one Clyde G-oldfuss, through an agent of Curtis, one Harry Bouklias, the stun of $50, with intent to influence defendant’s conduct with respect to his official duty, as follows, to wit: That Curtis would exercise his official influence to prevent the arrest of said G-oldfuss on account of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. AuerbachOhio Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. GroupOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Herman Krogmann and Emil Klauss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  4. State v. DerighterOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API