Legal Opinion

State v. Derighter

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1945No. 30274PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

It is insisted that the trial court committed numerous errors requiring the Court of Appeals to reverse the judgment.

Several of these alleged errors discussed by the Court'of Appeals are based upon a bill of particulars furnished by the prosecuting attorney after a request had been made by the defendants. The bill reads as follows:

“The state of Ohio will prove on the trial of the above stated case, the following matters:
“The defendants John T. DeRighter and Susan DeRighter, and Irene Kelley and Laundon T. McGrain conspired with one another and did plan, scheme and arrange for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DotyOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Curtis v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. ChaffinOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. NeviusOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. GingellOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API