Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1923No. 17626PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, J.:

1. Under Section 12823, General Code, “whoever being ... a state or other officer . . . solicits or ‘accepts any valuable or beneficial thing to influence him with respect to his official duty,” is guilty of a felony. A substantial favor asked by a public official in return for the official’s promise to give protection in illicit traffic in intoxicating liquors is a “valuable thing” within the meaning of the statute.

2. Improper remarks of counsel for the state during argument, unless so flagrantly improper as to prevent a ’fair trial, should be at once objected to and exception…

2Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. LozaOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. AlbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State v. DurrOhio Supreme Court · 1991

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API