Scott v. State
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, J.:
1. Under Section 12823, General Code, “whoever being ... a state or other officer . . . solicits or ‘accepts any valuable or beneficial thing to influence him with respect to his official duty,” is guilty of a felony. A substantial favor asked by a public official in return for the official’s promise to give protection in illicit traffic in intoxicating liquors is a “valuable thing” within the meaning of the statute.
2. Improper remarks of counsel for the state during argument, unless so flagrantly improper as to prevent a ’fair trial, should be at once objected to and exception…
2Cited by65 opinions
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. LandrumOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. LozaOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. AlbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. DurrOhio Supreme Court · 1991
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.