O'Connell v. Walker
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, refusing to dissolve a writ of attachment. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The court below declined to grant the motion of the appellant to discharge the writ of attachment issued in this action, and this appeal is from the order denying said motion.
The defendants were the directors of the California Safe Deposit and Trust Company for several years prior to and at the time that said company was declared to be insolvent by the state bank commissioners in the month of December, 1907, and at the time said corporation was adjudged insolvent and a receiver thereof appointed, on the eighteenth day of January, 1908, by the superior court in and for the city and county of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Winters v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Wilke v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- Paul v. Palm Springs Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Nichols v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Heaton v. Panhandle Smelting Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1919
- Patch v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Nichols v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.