Legal Opinion

Wilke v. Cohn

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,092PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from an order dissolving an attachment, in the -Nineteenth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Wheeler, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Department No. 2, Myrick, J.:

This is an appeal from an order dissolving an attachment.

The affidavit for attachment was in the form required by the statute as to statement of the indebtedness upon a contract made in this State, and concluded with these words: “ And that the payment of the same has not been secured by any mortgage or lien upon real or personal property; or, if originally so secured, that such security has, without any act of the plaintiff or the person to whom the security was given, become valueless.” Upon this affidavit the defendant moved to dissolve the attachment, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Botsford v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Hawley v. DelmasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Scrivener v. DietzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Harvey v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Winters v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. O'Connell v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Heaton v. Panhandle Smelting Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API