Legal Opinion

Patch v. Stewart

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1927No. 6,041PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

Tbis action involves tbe ownership of lots 11 and 12 of block 31 of tbe original town site of Poplar, Roosevelt county. Tbe cause was submitted-to tbe court upon an agreed statement of facts. Judgment was rendered against plaintiff, and in favor of defendant Advance-Rumely Tbresber Company. Plaintiff bas appealed from tbe judgment.

Briefly stated, tbe facts submitted to tbe court are as follows : Tbe Tbresber Company commenced an action in tbe district court of Roosevelt county against James M. and Grace M. Stewart, and on May 8, 1921, filed an affidavit and undertaking on attachment therein.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Rabbitt v. Frank C. Weber & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Moresi v. SwiftNevada Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Miller v. WhiteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Burnett v. McClueySupreme Court of Missouri · 1887

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hull v. D. Irvin Transport Ltd.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bailey v. HansenMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Bear Lake State Bank v. WilcoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Bancroft v. LevertyMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Hull v. D. Irvin Transport Ltd.Montana Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API