Legal Opinion
Nichols v. Davis
California Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 1914No. S.F. No. 6347PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. E. Pemberton, Keyes & Martin, and J. O. Davis, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to dismiss certain attachments.
This appeal presents many of the same questions that were decided by the district court of appeal in Nichols v. Davis, 23 Cal. App. 68, [137 Pac. 41]. The dispute here is between some of the same parties, the difference being that in the former case Rosina P. Davis was a co-defendant with her husband while in this action he is the sole defendant. Counsel for appellant call our attention to the fact that the notes on which that suit was based were signed only by the defendant and his wife, while those involved in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. GetchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Jensen v. DorrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Nichols v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- O'Connell v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rosenberg v. BullardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Hinkley v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Meyer v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952