Detroit Savings Bank v. Loveland
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Mandell, J. Assumpsit by the Detroit Savings Bank, assignee of George E. Currie, against Ralph Loveland, John A. Russell, George W. Williams, and George N. Skinner, for labor and materials furnished. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant Loveland brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
Plaintiff, as assignee of one George E. Currie, recovered a judgment against defendant in the sum of $8,672.81.
The declaration is in assumpsit and is accompanied by a bill of particulars which shows that the judgment represents the cost of partially sinking a shaft for a salt mine near the city of Detroit, less certain sums paid thereon, for which defendant is given credit. Defendant brings the case to this court for review by writ of error.
It appears that plaintiff’s assignor, Currie, had, prior to 1901, for many years been engaged as a contractor, building railways, sewers, pavements, etc.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Scripps v. SweeneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Pearson v. HardinMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Peninsular Stove Co. v. OsmunMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Schmoltz v. SchmoltzMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Richmond Engineering & Manufacturing Corp. v. LothSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Larson v. Van HornMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Fulton v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- O'Dell v. DayMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- American Electrical Steel Co. v. ScarpaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.