Pearson v. Hardin
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw. (Edget, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant Hardin brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
Plaintiff brought assumpsit on a promissory note, a copy of which was served with the declaration, consisting of the usual money counts. Defendant Sanborn did not appear, and his default was duly entered. Defendant Hardin filed a plea of the general issue, accompanied by a sworn denial of the execution of the note, and notice that the note was a forgery as to him. .
Plaintiff called a witness familiar with the writing of *365both defendants, who testified that the body of the note and the signature were in the handwriting of defendant Sanborn, and that the indorsement was the signature of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Henshaw v. BissellSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Watson's Executors v. McLarenNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Jackson ex dem. Varick v. WaldronCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1834
- Buckner v. CalcoteMississippi Supreme Court · 1855
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Detroit Savings Bank v. LovelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Ranchmens Trust Co. v. GillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- First Nat. Bank of Manistee v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Kennedy v. Lynch Timber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
- First National Bank v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank of MilwaukeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.