Legal Opinion

Peninsular Stove Co. v. Osmun

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChampiin, J.

Suit in the above-entitled cause was commenced in the circuit court for the county of Wayne upon the common counts in assumpsit by the filing of declaration, with notice indorsed requiring the defendants to plead in 20 days after service of copy of declaration. On the 20th day the defendants entered their appearance by Albert J. Chapman, their attorney, who on that day served a demand upon the plaintiff’s attorneys for a bill of particulars of the plaintiff’s claim. This demand was *572served February 27, 1888. The plaintiff did not comply with this demand, and no further steps were taken by…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Foster v. RowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Detroit Savings Bank v. LovelandMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Boudeman v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Bayer v. Winton Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API