Legal Opinion

Crane v. Kimmer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 7274PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Franklin, C.

July 4th, 1860, Elizabeth Kimmer dipd possessed and the owner of the southeast quarter of section 12, in township 15 north, of range 11 east, leaving appellee Samuel J. Kimmer, her husband, and five minor daughters, Sarah J., Elizabeth E., Mary F., Luzena A. and Emma F. Kimmer, all of whom were then single except Sarah J., who was intermarried with Benjamin Crane, one of the appellants herein ; that said Luzena A. and Emma F. refused to unite as plaintiffs herein, and were made defendants with their father, Samuel J.; that on the 19th day of March, 1866, the said Samuel J. Kimmer,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Horner v. DoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Miles v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Hough v. CanbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Iles v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Abdil v. AbdilIndiana Supreme Court · 1866

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Elston v. PiggottIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Miller v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Sims v. GayIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Elwood v. BeymerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API