Legal Opinion

Elston v. Piggott

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1884No. 11,047PublishedCited by 38 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The first question which we are required to decide is this: Is a decree and sale obtained by a trustee of a foreign corporation, whose agent has not filed a power of attorney as required by the act of June 17th, 1852, so destitute of force as to pass no title to the trustee who becomes a purchaser at the foreclosure sale? We think this question is not a difficult one. The failure of the agent of the corporation to file the power of attorney required by the statute was a matter to be pleaded in abatement in the suit in which the decree was rendered. Walter A. Wood, etc., Co. v. Caldwell, 54…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. Bank of the United States v. DeveauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  4. Louisville, Cincinnati, & Charleston Rail-Road v. LetsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  5. Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Cecil v. ClarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Ryason v. DuntenIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Robertson v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Finley v. CathcartIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Phenix Insurance v. Pennsylvania RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API