Legal Opinion

Hough v. Canby

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1846PublishedCited by 21 opinions

ERROR to the Jefferson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Deavey, J.—

Canby brought a bill in equity against the heirs of Orson E. Hough on a contract of sale of a certain lot of ground, made by Orson E. Hough and the complainant. The object of the bill was to enforce the vendor’s lien. The defendants were minors. It does not appear that process was served upon them. On the filing of the bill, the Court appointed a guardian ad litem for the defendants. The guardian appeared, but did not answer. The Court for want of a defence (no evidence being adduced on either side) decreed a sale of the premises contracted to be sold, and appointed a commissioner…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Horner v. DoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
  2. McCord v. BrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Good v. NorleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  4. Hawkins v. Hawkins' AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Abdil v. AbdilIndiana Supreme Court · 1866

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API