Iles v. Watson
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Howard Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
There are five paragraphs in the appellee’s complaint. We are inclined to think that all are good ; at all events, we are well satisfied that some of them are. The sufficiency of the complaint was not questioned in the court below. It is attacked for the first time by the assignment of errors in this court. Against such an attack the complaint must be sustained. Where a complaint is attacked *360for the first time upon appeal, it will be upheld, unless all the. paragraphs are bad. The Charlestown School Tp. v. Hay, 74 Ind. 127; Firestone v. Daniels, 71 Ind. 570.
The case was tried upon the issue…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Horner v. DoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
- Houk v. BartholdIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Charlestown School Township v. HayIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Abdil v. AbdilIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Anderson v. SpenceIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- State v. WenzelIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Sims v. GayIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Young v. WellsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- First Nat. Bank of Midland v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.