Legal Opinion

Juvland v. Mattson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 26, 1971No. 42468PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

The sole issue presented on plaintiffs’ appeal as permitted by leave of this court pursuant to Rule 105, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, is whether in this negligence action the trial court’s order granting a new trial for insufficiency of evidence may properly be limited to a retrial of the single issue of the percentage of causal negligence attributable to each tortfeasor.

The issue arises out of a jury trial of an action for personal-injury damages resulting from a collision between two automobiles in an uncontrolled intersection in the city of St. Paul. The issues…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Caldwell v. Piggly Wiggly Madison Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Koenigs v. WernerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Baierl v. HinshawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Blomberg v. TschidaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc. v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Ferguson v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Riley v. LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. BeckAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API