Legal Opinion

Baierl v. Hinshaw

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1966PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

While the brief of plaintiff-appellant raises 11 assignments of error, this opinion will be limited to consideration of the following three issues:(1) Was the form of verdict a proper manner in which to submit the negligence issues to the jury?(2) Should a new trial be directed, either on the ground of error or in the interest of justice, because of the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury with respect to the alleged failure of defendant to have both headlights on his car operating?(3) Did the trial court err in the instruction given on the issue of causation?

Form of Verdict.

At the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Osborne v. MontgomeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Nimits v. Motor Transport Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Madison Trust Co. v. HellecksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Grinley v. Town of Eau GalleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Zillmer v. MiglautschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Geis v. HirthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Fondell v. Lucky Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Juvland v. MattsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Knutson v. MuellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API