Caldwell v. Piggly Wiggly Madison Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
Piggly Wiggly pursued all of its objections by appropriate motions for nonsuit, mistrial, directed verdict, and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and the issues raised by those motions are before this court.
Was entryway under control of Piggly Wiggly as well as under control of Owens?
The initial argument of Piggly Wiggly is that it cannot be negligent under the safe-place statute because the entryway was not under its control at the time of the accident and, hence, negligence, if there were any, must be attributed to Owens, to whom control had been surrendered. The jury in its special…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bielski v. SchulzeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Turk v. H. C. Prange Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Schwenn v. Loraine Hotel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Boutin v. Cardinal Theatre Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Scott Davis, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Cross-Appellant, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Sitzes v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Bofman v. Material Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Strack v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Fye v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.