Legal Opinion

Sargent v. Holland

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided May 7, 1996No. Civil Action 2:95-0504PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending are cross motions for summary judgment. The Court GRANTS summary judgment for Defendants.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, Roger L. Sargent, was employed in the coal industry from 1977 to May 9,1991 when he suffered a disabling injury as a result of a mine accident. He has been totally disabled since that time. Defendants are the Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) 1974 Pension Trust, one of six separate employee benefit trusts, collectively known as the UMWA Health and Retirement Funds (Funds).

Plaintiff applied for disability…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sargent v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  2. Hurley v. HollandDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996
  3. Offenberg v. Olin Corp. Long-Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1998
  4. Offenberg v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1997
  5. Sargent v. HollandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API