Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Holland

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided June 20, 1996No. Civil Action No. 2:95-1032PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. After careful consideration of the parties’ submissions and the record, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ (the Trustees’) motion for summary judgment and DENIES Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

I. DISCUSSION

A. Factual and Procedural Development:

Plaintiff Ronald L. Hurley is a fifty-one-year-old former miner employed intermittently in the coal industry from 1970 to 1991. In a hearing conducted January 10, 1991 Hurley presented evidence of his total disability, due to certain medical…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  4. Gaynell Boyd v. Trustees of the United Mine Workers Health & Retirement FundsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  5. Clarence E. Lockhart v. United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust Paul R. Dean Michael H. Holland Marty D. Hudson Elliott A. Segal, TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lester v. United Mine Workers of America Health & Retirement FundDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API