Legal Opinion

Offenberg v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided December 2, 1997No. CIV. A. 6:96-1908Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 1 After careful consideration, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion without prejudice and REMANDS Plaintiff Grant R. Offenberg’s disability claim to the Plan Administrator for consideration of further evidence.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Offenberg was a full-time salaried employee of Defendant Olin Corporation. He had worked over 22 years for Olin when he became permanently and totally disabled in April of 1993. Offenberg has a back condition which has required two spinal surgical procedures. In 1993…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  4. Thompson Everett, Inc. v. National Cable Advertising, L.P. Cable Networks, Inc. Cable Media CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  5. De Nobel v. Vitro Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API