Legal Opinion
Tarka v. Filipovic
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 6, 1997No. AC 15153PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The plaintiff, Melanie Tarka, appeals from the trial court’s decision rendering judgment in accordance with an attorney trial referee’s report. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that the facts found did not constitute (1) an invasion of privacy and (2) a violation of the Connecti*48cut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq.
After trial before an attorney trial referee (attorney referee), the attorney referee submitted a twenty-six page report of her findings and recommendations. The trial court rendered…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Perkins v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Seal Audio, Inc. v. Bozak, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc./Franki Foundation Co. v. GillSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Paulus v. LaSalaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Byra-Grzegorczyk v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Kallas v. HarnenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Foncello v. AmorossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Calandro v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.