Legal Opinion

Foncello v. Amorossi

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 16, 2007No. SC 17832PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZARELLA, J.

In this action alleging invasion of privacy and identify theft, the plaintiff, Martin Foncello, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendants, Richard Amorossi and Howard Lasser. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that (1) Lasser’s disclosure of private information to members of the public and the press, including the plaintiffs social security number, retirement data and military orders, did not constitute an invasion of the plaintiffs privacy, (2) Lasser’s disclosure of the plaintiffs social security…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Monetary Funding Group, Inc. v. PluchinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Wright v. HuttConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  4. Tarka v. FilipovicConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Caro v. WeintraubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Johnson v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. Watson Real Estate, LLC v. Woodland Ridge, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. Brady v. BickfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  5. Davidson v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API